Legal Opinion

Rinderer v. Delaware County Children & Youth Services

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1987No. 85-6496PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

O’NEILL, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 1987, upon consideration of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, 1 and response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. As to Delaware County Children and Youth Services, said motion is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED as to said defendant.

a. As plaintiffs concede, the allegations of the complaint do not state a cause of action against DCCYS under 42 U.S.C. § 1985, or under § 1983 on the basis of respondeat superior, and plaintiffs cannot recover punitive damages against DCCYS.

b. The complaint also fails to state a cause…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fanning v. Montgomery County Children & Youth ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Coleman v. State of New Jersey Division of Youth & Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  4. Sergio v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Miller v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API