Coleman v. State of New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’, State of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, and caseworkers Wilma Acevedo and Letitia Pellot, Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1367. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
I
Elaine Coleman (“Coleman”) was the subject of an investigation by the State of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (“DYFS”). On September 30, 1999, responding to an anonymous complaint, two DYFS caseworkers,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gedrich v. Fairfax County Department of Family ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- K.J. ex rel. Lowry v. Division of Youth & Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Fortuna's Cab Service, Inc. v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Bostrom v. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.