Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1981No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*379OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
IBM, defendant in this antitrust action, has moved this court to admit designated sections of fifteen depositions taken before and during the course of this trial.1 IBM seeks admission of the depositions as part of its direct case. Ten of the depositions were taken by defendant of plaintiff’s listed trial witnesses. Six of these ten deponents later testified at trial for plaintiff. The remaining five depositions were taken by plaintiff of defendant’s proposed trial witnesses.2 IBM, in its various motions and offers, sets forth three…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- George D. Hartman, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Ikerd v. LapworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Community Counselling Service, Incorporated v. Robert Benedict ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Manley v. Ambase Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Coleman v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
- David Polys and Marcia Polys v. Trans-Colorado Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Green v. CosbyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.