Legal Opinion
In Re the Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1989No. CO-89-513PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This is an appeal from orders of the district court granting a petition to condemn property and authorizing a quick take. The appellant landowner claims the taking violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment and asks either that the condemnation proceeding be dismissed or that an evidentiary hearing be held on the constitutionality of the taking. We deny appellant’s claims and affirm the district court.
The LaSalle Place Development Project is a program to develop a block in downtown Minneapolis bounded by Hennepin Avenue, Eighth Street, LaSalle Avenue, and Ninth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tilton v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hunt v. McNairSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brent Gisslen v. City of Crystal, Minnesota, a Municipality E. Gary Joselyn, Individually, and in His Official Capacities Thomas A. Mathisen, Individually and in His Official Capacities Jerry Dulgar, Individually, and in His Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- City of Rochester v. Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Brent Gisslen v. City of Crystal, MNCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Rochester v. PEOPLES CO-OP. POWER ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993