Legal Opinion

Rochester v. PEOPLES CO-OP. POWER ASS'N

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1993No. C8-93-19, C4-93-20, CX-93-37, C3-93-39, C7-93-75Published

1Opinion of the Court

505 N.W.2d 621 (1993)

CITY OF ROCHESTER, petitioner, Respondent,

v.

PEOPLES COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondents (C8-93-19, C7-93-75), Appellants (C4-93-20, CX-93-37),

United States of America, through its Administrator of the Rural Electrification Administration, et al., Appellants (C3-93-39), Respondents (C7-93-75),

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Intervenor, Appellant (C8-93-19, C7-93-75).

Nos. C8-93-19, C4-93-20, CX-93-37, C3-93-39, C7-93-75.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 31, 1993.

Joseph F. Chase, Julia E. Utz, O'Brien, Ehrick, Wolf, Deaner, & Maus, Rochester,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. United States of America, Inland Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API