Legal Opinion
National Advertising Co. v. County of Monterey
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1962No. Civ., 20366PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Defendant county and its officers appeal from decree enjoining enforcement of those provisions of a comprehensive zoning ordinance which prohibit construction and maintenance of billboards in certain districts.
The ordinance was adopted April 18, 1955. It distinguishes between “appurtenant” signs, those which “relate only to goods sold or services rendered upon the building site on which said sign is erected,” and all others, which we shall refer to as off-site signs. Appurtenant signs are permitted in most zones but are restricted as to size and number. Off-site signs are permitted only in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.