Legal Opinion

Mannarino v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 28, 2003No. 01 CV 0931(CPS)(RML)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEVY, United States Magistrate Judge.

By letter dated August 25, 2002, defendant United States of America moves to compel plaintiff Justin Mannarino to pay defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Anthony Storace, $3,064 in fees and expenses related to his deposition. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff is directed to pay Dr. Storace $1,484.

BACKGROUND AND FACTS

Plaintiff Justin Mannarino (“plaintiff’ or “Mannarino”) commenced this action against defendant United States of America (“defendant” or “the Government”) under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  2. Anthony v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Hurst v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  4. Grdinich v. BradleesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. McHale v. WestcottDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Korabik v. Arcelormittal Plate LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. Corporacion Habanos, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  4. Feliciano v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Banga v. KaniosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API