Legal Opinion

Lorenzen v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. WCB 84-01859; CA A37060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing a referee’s decision that claimant is entitled to reimbursement under ORS 656.245(1) for child care expenses incurred while she was hospitalized for treatment of her compensable condition. The Board decided that, because no physician connected claimant’s need for child care services with recovery from her injuries, she had failed to prove that the child care services were compensable as “medical or other related services” under the statute.1 We affirm, but for a different reason.

We are not persuaded that child care…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skinner v. KeeleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Baar v. Fairview Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Morelli v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API