Lorenzen v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing a referee’s decision that claimant is entitled to reimbursement under ORS 656.245(1) for child care expenses incurred while she was hospitalized for treatment of her compensable condition. The Board decided that, because no physician connected claimant’s need for child care services with recovery from her injuries, she had failed to prove that the child care services were compensable as “medical or other related services” under the statute.1 We affirm, but for a different reason.
We are not persuaded that child care…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Skinner v. KeeleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Baar v. Fairview Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Morelli v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017