Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Libbey Glass Mfg. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1928No. 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULL TEXT.

HUGHES, J.

The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant upon the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff, which disclosed in substance, the following facts:

Plaintiff, a glass tube gauger in the employ of defendant, received an injury to her ankle while in the course of her employment. She was taken to the first aid hospital, operated by defendant, by the servants of defendant, and there received treatment. At a later day her ankle became swollen, and again by the servants of defendant she was taken to Doctor Baldwin, a physician in the employ of defendant, who treated her…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bevis v. Armco Steel Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Proctor v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Gardner v. HooverOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Pyles v. Industrial CommOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API