Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pyles v. Industrial Comm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1936No. 2694Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

The action is in mandamus. The petition recites in substance, that the relator suffered an injury in the course of and arising out of his employment on or about October 31, 1933, which injury consisted of a compound, comminuted and crushing fracture of the upper third of the right femur; that he applied for compensation to the respondent commission; that his claim was allowed; that he was paid compensation for such injury; that because of such injury he was confined to a hospital, from which he was released; that as a treatment for his fractured leg it was placed in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Wagner v. . MittendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Fay v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hartnett v. TrippMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Selak v. Murray Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API