Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1972No. 31364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This case comes here from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County after that court sustained the motions for summary judgment filed by the corporate and individual defendants.

The parties will be designated in this opinion as “plaintiff/7 “corporate defendant77 and “individual defendants.77 Plaintiff appeals.

I

The facts are simple, clear-cut and not in issue. The plaintiff suffered a compensable injury in the course of or arising out of his employment. He elected, as R. C. 4123.651 allows, to be treated at the corporate defendant’s industrial clinic where he claims his injury was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Jasinsky v. PottsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. AspellOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anna M. Evans, of Olen E. Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Boyle v. BremeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Boyle v. BremeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API