Legal Opinion

Kofoed v. Bray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1923No. 5,311PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This action is one for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land and water rights. In the beginning the defendant and wife gave to plaintiff a writing which reads this way:

“Hall, Montana, October 23, 1909.
“Received from Hans A. Kofoed One Hundred & Fifty Dollars ($150.00) in part payment for ranch of 200 acres, on Section 31, Township 10, Range 13 W., water rights of located 1869 & 1871. If not as I say and represent the money to be returned.
“ [Signed] Josephine Bray.
“John Bray.”

Three days later the parties met at a law office in Philipsburg. There Josephine Bray executed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Adams v. StenehjemMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bullerdick v. HermsmeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Verwolf v. Low Line Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Shaw v. McNamara & Marlow, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API