Rudy v. A-Best Products Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
LALLY-GREEN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Troy and Charlotte Rudy, appeal from the order dated December 16, 2003. This order entered a final judgment in favor of defendants/appellees, Metropolitan Edison Company, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Pennsylvania Electric Company, GPU Service, Inc., GPU Nuclear, Inc., and GPU, Inc. (collectively, “the TMI Defendants”). We affirm.
¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of the case is as follows. Levi Rudy (“Rudy”) worked as a plumber/pipefitter at the Three Mile Island (“TMI”) Power Station from 1969 to 1980. Rudy was an employee of independent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Gillingham v. Consol Energy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Summers v. Certainteed Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Eisbacher, A. v. Maytag Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.