Legal Opinion

Rudy v. A-Best Products Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Troy and Charlotte Rudy, appeal from the order dated December 16, 2003. This order entered a final judgment in favor of defendants/appellees, Metropolitan Edison Company, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Pennsylvania Electric Company, GPU Service, Inc., GPU Nuclear, Inc., and GPU, Inc. (collectively, “the TMI Defendants”). We affirm.

¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of the case is as follows. Levi Rudy (“Rudy”) worked as a plumber/pipefitter at the Three Mile Island (“TMI”) Power Station from 1969 to 1980. Rudy was an employee of independent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Gillingham v. Consol Energy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Summers v. Certainteed Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Eisbacher, A. v. Maytag Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API