Legal Opinion

Gillingham v. Consol Energy, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 2012PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

In these consolidated appeals, Consol Energy, Inc., (“Consol”) raises challenges to various rulings made during the course of this personal injury action as well as to the jury award in favor of Appellees herein, David and Debra Gillingham and Clifford and Pamela Decker. We affirm.

We set forth a brief factual and procedural recitation before addressing the issues raised in this appeal. On June 12, 2007, Mr. Gillingham and Mr. Decker were working at Building No. 19 at the Consol facility in South Park, Pennsylvania, when they exited the second floor of the concrete building…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. McEwing v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Reinoso, G. v. Heritage Warminster SPESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API