Legal Opinion
Payton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 21, 1933No. 23117PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The Department of Industrial Eelations denied claimant compensation. She appealed from this finding to the superior court. That court affirmed the finding of the commission, and to this judgment she excepts.
*7481. While there was evidence which would have amply supported a finding that the claimant was injured by an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment, notwithstanding the testimony of the medical experts to the contrary (City of Atlanta v. Champe, 66 Ga. 659, 663; Southern Ry. Co. v. Tankersley, 3 Ga. App. 548, 60 S. E. 297; London Guarantee & Accident Cor. v. Wallace, 35…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Southern Railway Co. v. TankersleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- City of Atlanta v. ChampeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brady v. Royal Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Kimbro v. Black & White Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Davis v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Butler v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Clark v. Fisher Body Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.