Legal Opinion
Bowman v. City of Indianapolis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 22, 1994No. IP 91-785 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, Chief Judge.
David B. Bowman (“Bowman”) and the City of Indianapolis, et al. (“Defendants”), bring cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, we grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part and deny it in part and deny Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to both counts.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Bowman joined the Indianapolis Police Department (“IPD”) on October 7, 1963, and during the relevant time period of his employment, held the positions of field lieutenant, field captain, and coordinator at the Municipal Garage from April, 1986, through…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David B. Bowman v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Jackson v. Com. of Ky.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1995
- Bowman v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995