Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1990No. 115, September Term, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

320 Md. 756 (1990)

580 A.2d 196

TIMOTHY MITCHELL

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND.

No. 115, September Term, 1989.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

October 9, 1990.

Nancy S. Forster, Asst. Public Defender and George E. Burns, Jr., Asst. Public Defender (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, all on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Richard B. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., both on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, ADKINS[*] and CHASANOW, JJ.

McAULIFFE, Judge.

Having just been sentenced, and while still standing at the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API