Legal Opinion
Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1930No. Docket No. 7292PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This is an original prohibition proceeding. The petitioners seek to prevent the respondent court from enforcing a preliminary injunction and order modifying the same and also to check any further order or proceeding against them in an action pending in the respondent court entitled People of the State of California on Relation of Fred G. Stevenot, Director of Natural Resources of the State of California v. Associated Oil Company et al., which action was brought for the purpose of enjoining all of the defendants therein named from unreasonably wasting natural gas from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- West v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.