Legal Opinion

State v. Nevel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 1994No. C91-09-34444; CA A74105Published

1Opinion of the Court

868 P.2d 1338 (1994)

126 Or. App. 270

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Ray NEVEL, Appellant.

No. C91-09-34444; CA A74105.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 10, 1993.

February 9, 1994.

Zack M. Lorts, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was J. Kevin Hunt, Oregon City.

Ann F. Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API