Legal Opinion

Cline v. Roemer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1976No. 11793PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This action arose out of a 1971 real estate transaction in which plaintiff-respondents Virgil and Roberta Cline allegedly contemplated the purchase of a parcel of real estate from Imo Purcell. Defendant-appellant John Roemer acted as an intermediary between the parties in his capacity as a real estate broker. During the course of the negotiations the Clines delivered $8,000.00 to Roemer as a down payment on the property. The transaction then failed and the Clines sued Roemer for the amount paid. On October 31, 1972, at a time when Roemer was acting as his own attorney, a summary judgment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hay v. HayIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Oregon Shortline Railroad Co. v. City of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Klaudt v. KlaudtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Corporation CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Industrial Investment Corp. v. RoccaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Dustin v. BeckstrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of Estate of HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API