Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Cravens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Action by the appellant, against the appellees. Judgment for the defendants.

The case made by the complaint is briefly this:

One Vandever was sheriff of Ripley county, and John Mullen, Walter Bogot and David H. Kitts were sureties on his bond.

In Eovember, 1867, Frank Dennison recovered a judgment in the court of common pleas of said county, against the said sheriff and his said sureties on his bond, for two hundred dollars and costs, which judgment was a lien on certain real estate, previously transferred by Kitts, to Cravens, as hereinafter stated. The judgment was also a lien on certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Musselman v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Burk v. AndisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sidener v. GalbraithIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Baugh v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API