Burk v. Andis
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
James Neal brought an action against Patrick Burk to recover land and damages.
After trial and verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff took a new trial as of right, and then with leave of court amended his complaint by substituting Samuel R. Andis and others as plaintiffs in his stead.
A motion by the defendant to tax all the costs of the cause, up to the time of the amendment, against said James Neal, was overruled.
The record shows no answer to the amended complaint, •but there was a trial by jury with a verdict for the plaintiffs; therefore, the cause must be regarded as tried…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Burns v. BarenfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. DoonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Steigerwald v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Chapman v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.