Legal Opinion

Weigand v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 13116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed as a conductor for the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. 45 U. S.C.A. § 51 et seq.

Upon jury trial verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

*845The matter before the court relates to plaintiff’s motion for new trial in which it is contended:

1. The verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence.1

2. The court erred in refusing Plaintiff’s Request for Charge No. 6 and No. 8.2

Succinctly stated, the principal legal question presented may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Pearl Thomas, Administratrix of the Estate of Lewis Samuel Thomas, Deceased v. Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. De Pascale v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  5. Sweeting v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George S. Weigand v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API