Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hall Street Associates (“Hall Street”) brings this action against defendants Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) and its predecessors, seeking an order from this court that Mattel is required to meet its contractual obligations through April 30, 2003. The case was tried to the court on April 27, 2001 and April 30, 2001. Having considered the testimony, documentary evidence, and the arguments of counsel, judgment will be entered for Mattel based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Cipriano v. Triad Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Varner v. EvesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999