Legal Opinion

Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 21, 2001No. CIV 00-355-JOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Hall Street Associates (“Hall Street”) brings this action against defendants Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) and its predecessors, seeking an order from this court that Mattel is required to meet its contractual obligations through April 30, 2003. The case was tried to the court on April 27, 2001 and April 30, 2001. Having considered the testimony, documentary evidence, and the arguments of counsel, judgment will be entered for Mattel based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Cipriano v. Triad Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Varner v. EvesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API