Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Cipriano v. Triad Mechanical, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 16, 1996No. 9306-04234; CA A84922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*109WARREN, P. J.
Triad Mechanical, Inc., appeals from a judgment dismissing its breach of contract and quantum meruit claims against the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Before trial, the court granted ODFW’s motion under the parol evidence rule to exclude evidence of anything intended to contradict the terms of a written contract and change orders signed by ODFW and Triad. The trial court also ruled that two change orders constituted an accord and satisfaction between ODFW and Triad. Those rulings effectively precluded Triad from presenting evidence to support its claims. The court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- M.J. Paquet, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Pierre Arboireau and Sandrine Arboireau v. Adidas-Salomon Ag, a Foreign Corporation and Adidas America, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Loverin v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- McDonald v. Sun Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.