Legal Opinion
Hatley v. Stafford
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1978No. 75-4433, SC 25168PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*525HOWELL, J.
Plaintiff, lessee, filed this action for trespass against defendants, lessors. The property involved is a 52-acre farm in Lane County. The defendants contended they were entitled under the lease agreement to terminate the lease and recover possession.
The following is the entire written agreement of the parties relating to the lease:
"Oct. 16, 1974
"Stafford Farm agrees to rent to Mike Hatley Rt. 1 Box 83, Halsey, Ore. approximately 52 acres till Sept. 1st 1975 for the purpose of growing wheat with the follow [sic] condition: — Stafford Farm shall have the right to buy out Mr. Mike…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. v. DolinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- McDonald v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.