Legal Opinion

United States v. James Howell Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1966No. 16511_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky wherein defendant-appellant, James Howell Smith, was found guilty of possessing and passing counterfeit bills in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472.

About noon of April 14, 1964, one James Williams, part owner of the Dairy Malt Drive-In, Georgetown, Kentucky, and also a deputy sheriff, refused to cash a ten dollar bill for appellant because it “doesn’t look right.” A clerk in the same establishment had just accepted a twenty dollar bill from the same man in payment for a ninety-three cent purchase. Williams looked at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. James C. Dillard v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Jerome Byrnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Barber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Hugh R. Conway, George M. Lebosky, Robert Davidoff, Hugh R. Conway, in No. 17,369, George M. Lebosky, in No. 17,391Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Layton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rodis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. MANSON v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. United States v. Donald EverettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API