Legal Opinion

MANSON v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1967No. 30,955PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

The appellants were charged and found guilty of grand larceny and sentenced accordingly. They have appealed. The specifications are that the trial court erred in overruling the motion to suppress evidence obtained in the search of defendant Suber’s automobile, The points presented in the briefs center mainly about this contention.

The evidence shows that officer Frank Rose of the Kokomo police department received a radio message over the police radio system that there were two colored subjects at Maple-crest shopping center and believed to be in Golightly’s store, and they were seen in a blue…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Idol v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hanger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gwinn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. United States v. James Howell SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Layton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ashley & Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API