Legal Opinion

State Compensation Fund v. Symington

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1993No. CV-92-0243-SAPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State Compensation Fund (the Fund) filed this special action directly in this court seeking to have §§ 1, 2, and 8 of House Bill 2001 declared unconstitutional. It became effective June 30, 1992, see 1992 Ariz. Legis.Serv. 7th Spec.Sess., ch. 3. The challenged provisions: (1) amend the method of calculating the federal equivalency tax payable by the Fund; (2) impose an annual alternative minimum tax of $500,000 on the Fund; and (3) apply both of these new tax provisions retroactively to January 1, 1990. The Fund advances several…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API