Joe Mike Egan, Jr. and Shari Ann Egan v. Byron Flanary Egan and Nancy Dean Egan
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.
Joe Mike Egan sought partition of a ranch he shared with his brother, Byron Flanary Egan. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 756-771. The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict which found that the ranch was not partitionable and ordered the ranch sold. Tex.R.Civ.P. 770. In five points of error Joe Mike Egan complains of the jury charge, inadmissible expert testimony and of Byron Egan’s conduct during the trial. We will affirm.
Facts and PROCEDURAL History
Brothers (and lawyers) Joe Mike and Byron Egan owned an undivided half-interest in a 986.387-acre ranch along…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- United Blood Services v. LongoriaTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paul James Grudzien v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2004
- Willie Fields v. Metroplex Hospital Foundation Metroplex Adventist Hospital, Inc. Adventist Health System And Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006