Terzo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant, was convicted under an indietment containing two counts, each charging a sale of intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1923, et seq.). The indietment also alleged a prior conviction for like unlawful sales, and the jury found specially that this was true.
Seven specifications of error are relied upon. The first three raise the question whether there was any evidence of former *358conviction. In proof óf former conviction there was introduced in evidence pages 216, 217, 218,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Haussener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Peru v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Coyne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Gallaghan v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lennon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. Roy Lee CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Havener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Edwards v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943