Coyne v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Gordon Russell, Judge. Dee F. Coyne was convicted of violating Act June 25, 1910, commonly known as the White Slave Traffic Act, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WADLKER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of a .violation of Act Cong. June 25, 1910, c. 395, 36 Stat. 825 (Comp. St. 1916, §§ 8812-8819), commonly known as the White Slave Traffic Act. He testified as a witness in his own behalf. On his cross-examination he was required, over objection duly interposed by his counsel, to answer the question: “You are under indictriient up there in the federal court in Seattle for blackmail ?” His answer to the question was: “I don’t know. I deny that I am under indictment in Seattle. I have no knowledge of any other indictment, only right…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Slater v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Bonaparte v. ThayerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- People v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. OrecchioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- United States v. Edwin Wallace PennixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Billington v. SchaalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Rosencrance v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- United States v. Peter Collins, A/K/A "Gypsy Black", and Inett BranchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.