State v. Pfeiffer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE KITTREDGE :
**12 The State's appeal from the grant of Frederick Scott Pfeiffer's second Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP, motion presents the following question: after the disposition of an initial Rule 29(a) motion, and more than ten days after imposition of the sentence, does the trial court have jurisdiction to hear a second Rule 29(a) motion? We answer the question by holding the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear a second Rule 29(a) motion, unless the second motion challenges something that was altered from the original sentence as a result of the initial Rule 29(a) motion.
I
On September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- United States v. Carmen GuevaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Coward Hund Construction Co. v. Ball Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bolick v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022