Legal Opinion

State v. Pfeiffer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 29, 2019No. Appellate Case 2018-001153; Opinion 27891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE KITTREDGE :

**12 The State's appeal from the grant of Frederick Scott Pfeiffer's second Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP, motion presents the following question: after the disposition of an initial Rule 29(a) motion, and more than ten days after imposition of the sentence, does the trial court have jurisdiction to hear a second Rule 29(a) motion? We answer the question by holding the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear a second Rule 29(a) motion, unless the second motion challenges something that was altered from the original sentence as a result of the initial Rule 29(a) motion.

I

On September…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. United States v. Carmen GuevaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Coward Hund Construction Co. v. Ball Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bolick v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API