Legal Opinion
Coward Hund Construction Co. v. Ball Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 10, 1999No. 2989PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, Judge:
Coward Hund Construction Co., Inc., appeals the grant of summary judgment to Ball Corp. and Carolina Glass Contractors, Inc. We dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
Coward Hund sued Ball and Carolina Glass alleging claims for negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, breach of contract, and indemnification arising from allegedly defective building repairs. Subsequently, Carolina Glass moved to dismiss the action, and Ball Corp. moved for summary judgment. Carolina Glass’s motion to dismiss was apparently converted to a summary judgment motion without objection from Coward Hund.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Pelican Building Centers of Horry-Georgetown, Inc. v. DuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Annette Brown v. United Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clegg Ex Rel. Estate of CleggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Canal Insurance v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.