Legal Opinion

Bowring v. Wilmington Malleable Iron Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 22, 1907No. Action on the case No. 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

to recover from the defendant damages for the loss of services of his minor son, and expenses incurred on account of personal injuries received by said minor in an accident which happened in the manufacturing plant of said company upon a planing machine, and alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence. Demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the CourtPennewill, J.

In this action Francis J. Bowring, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover in his own right from the defendant company damages for the loss of services of his minor son, and expenses incurred on account of personal injuries received by said minor in an accident which happened in the manufacturing plant of said company, and alleged to have been caused by and through its negligence.

The plaintiff, in a former action brought by him as the next friend of his son, to the May Term of this Court, 1904, sought to recover from said company damages for injuries to the son growing out of the same accident;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. West v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gooden ex rel. Gooden v. RaylSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. MorinTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruocco v. LogioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. S.L. v. A.L.Delaware Family Court · 1999
  3. S.L. v. A.L.Delaware Family Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API