Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Gould
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 31, 1987No. 4501; 4502PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
In these combined appeals, Harry Gould appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his application to vacate an arbitration award and granting, in part, Martin Wolfs application to confirm the award. Gould claims that the trial court erred in confirming the award because the arbitrator exceeded their powers or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter was not made, in violation of General Statutes § 52-418 (a) (4). More specifically, he claims that the trial court erred by rendering an award that (1) did not conform to the submission as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Education v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 287Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Waterbury Board of Education v. Waterbury Teachers Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Town of Trumbull v. Trumbull Police Local 1745Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- All Seasons Services, Inc. v. GuildnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Morganti, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Vincent Builders, Inc. v. American Application Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Hayes v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Haggerty v. ParniewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.