Legal Opinion
Morganti, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 1989No. 7578PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
In this action, Morganti, Incorporated (Morganti), applied for an order confirming an arbitration award and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIP), in a separate application, moved to vacate that same award.
On August 23,1983, the parties entered into a written agreement wherein Morganti agreed, as a general contractor, to construct and renovate the research and *69development facilities owned by BIP at its facility in Ridgefield. At the conclusion of the project on August 8, 1986, Morganti filed a demand for arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in that contract, §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Meyers v. Lakeridge Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Stabenau v. CairelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Glinski v. GlinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1336Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.