Legal Opinion
Rahman v. Blinken
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-3235Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABDUL BARI RAHMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 23-3235 (JDB) ANTONY J. BLINKEN et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Abdul Bari Rahman, along with his wife and three children, alleges that various government officials (collectively, the “State Department”) improperly revoked Rahman’s Chief of Mission approval for an Afghan Special Immigrant Visa in violation of his due process rights, the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), and the All Writs Act. He further alleges that the State Department unreasonably delayed…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.