Legal Opinion

Montgomery, Zukerman, Davis, Inc. v. Diepenbrock

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 21, 1988No. IP88-242-CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on the joint motion to dismiss filed by defendant Robbert Diepenbrock and defendant Marion Properties & Investments. The plaintiff has filed a brief opposing the motion, and the defendants filed their reply on July 8,1988. The questions raised are ready for resolution, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES defendant Marion Properties’ motion to dismiss in its entirety, DENIES Diepenbrock’s motion to dismiss in part and GRANTS it in part, QUASHES the service of process…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba SeedsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Randolph v. HendryDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
  4. Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. EOI Corp. v. Medical Marketing Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API