Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local No. 12

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 19, 2010No. Case No. 3:02CV7422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, current and former machine repair employees of Daimler Chrysler at two Chrysler Jeep plants in Toledo, Ohio, bring suit alleging that various actions taken by union defendants (UAW International (International) and UAW Local 12 (Local 12)) gave preferential treatment to other skilled workers and thus violated the unions’ duty of fair representation.

Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Pending are union defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. 180] and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. 189]. For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wigington v. Metro. Nashville Airport Auth.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  2. Burkholder v. INTERN. UNION, UNITED AUTO.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API