Emery v. a & B Commercial Finishing Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
In the action out of which this appeal arose, defendant in error, as plaintiff, sued plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages for attempting to injure its business and reputation by enticing away its employees and inducing one of its patrons, Tulsa Testing Laboratory, to breach a contract with it for the painting of certain “hubs” and “spacers.” After plaintiff had failed to show it had suffered any damages from the first of these alleged causes, and, both parties had moved for directed verdicts, the trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for such a verdict in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Brinkley & West, Inc. v. Foremost Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Arabesque Studios, Inc. v. Academy of Fine Arts International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Crystal Gas Co. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Levin v. Kuhn Loeb & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.