Gillette & English v. Carroll & Hogan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Gillette and English owned a ranch in the State of Oklahoma, with certain personal propertv thereon, which they decided to sell or exchange, and with that purpose in view they prepared a circular letter descriptive of their property, which they mailed to a large number of real estate agents. One of these letters was received by Carroll and Hogan, partners as Carroll & Hogan, residing at 'Bentonville, in this State, and engaged. there in the real estate business.
Gillette represented himself and English in the transaction out of which this litigation arose, and Carroll represented himself and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. GodboldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Featherston v. TroneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Murphy v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Meyer v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blankenship v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924