Meyer v. Holland
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; Galvin. T. Cotham, Judge; The case of Scott v. Patterson, 53 Ark. 52, settles the law of this case, we think. See also 52 Mo. 249; Fitch, Real Estate Agency, 119; 55 N. T. 319.
1Opinion of the Court
■Smith, J.
Appellee recovered judgment for commissions claimed by Mm upon a sale of real estate owned by appellant.
The evidence is not abstracted fully by appellant, but Ms contention is that the evidence at the trial developed the following facts: That appellant listed certain lands with appellee, hut reserved the right to sell the lands himself, if he found a purchaser. That appellees showed the property to one Epps, who was himself a real estate dealer, and subsequently introduced Epps to appellant. 'That appellant and Epps were unable to trade, but appellant listed his lands with Epps, who…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gillette & English v. Carroll & HoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Horton & Co. v. BeallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914