Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 5, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Blankenship sued McDaniel on a note for $75 in the court of a justice of the peace, and McDaniel set up a counterclaim, which he appears to have used for the purpose only of extinguishing the debt evidenced by the note sued on: McDaniel testified that he contracted to buy from one Hall a tract of land for $3,000, but, before a deed was made, he contracted to sell it to Blankenship for $4,000. That he told Hall what he had done, and directed Hall to make the deed direct to Blankenship, and that, when he bronght Hall and Blankenship together, they ratified what he had done, but later refused to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kilgore Lumber Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Murphy v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Jones v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Felhauer v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Gillette & English v. Carroll & HoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API