Legal Opinion

Fox v. Mission of Immaculate Virgin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action, one on behalf of the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the infant when he fell through an alleged unscreened and unguarded window in the dormitory of defendant’s premises, and the other by the infant plaintiff’s mother to recover for loss of services and medical expenses.

“ Generally speaking,”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Corbett v. . St. Vincent's Industrial SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Crosby v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Strauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Bernal v. Baptist Fresh Air Home SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. County of OtsegoNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Mayberry v. PryorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Miller v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API