Legal Opinion

Strauss v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 8, 1947No. 103, Docket 20359PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The only issue is whether the court below correctly concluded that the defendant did not stand in loco parentis to the insured. It is-clear that the insured thought she did, and that he wished her to receive the proceeds of the policy, but this is not decisive of the question. The National Insurance Act, 38 U.S.C.A. § 802(g) provides that “the insurance shall be payable only to a widow, widower, child * * * parent * * * brother or sister of the insured. The insured shall have the right to designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the insurance, but only within the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niewiadomski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Meisner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924
  3. Zazove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. Howard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1924
  5. Horsman v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. D'Auria v. LiposkySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Estate of LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Baumet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Estate of TeddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Miller v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API