Legal Opinion
PAYAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1972No. 2128PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2128 MATTER OF PAYAN In Deportation Proceedings A-12618819 Decided by Board March 3, 1972 (1) An ex parts statement of a Government witness is not, for lack of cross– examination, precluded from meeting the test of clear, convincing and unequi- vocal evidence as enunciated in Woodby v. I. & N. 8.,
385 U.S. 276
(1966), where full opportunity to take depositions was afforded but declined. (2) Where evidence contained in the record of her conviction of conspiring to aid and assist aliens, coupled with evidence developed during the deportation hearing (indicating the ongoing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Gary Lee Etheridge, Georgia Etheridge, William Eugene Beard, James Hermanbostic, Sammy Ray ColeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Vicente Navarrette-Navarrette v. H. R. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Haymes v. LandonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- PONCOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974