Legal Opinion

Haymes v. Landon

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 16, 1953No. 15819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOLIN, District Judge.

The matter for decision is a Motion for Dismissal of a Petition for Injunction, Declaratory Relief and Judicial Review and a supplemental motion which includes a prayer for determination by a three-judge court that Sections 241 (a) (1) and 212(a) (22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1251(a) (1), 1182(a) (22), are unconstitutional and void and that as applied to petitioner, Section 212(d) (7) is unconstitutional. Petitioner prays for an injunction restraining the District Director of Immigration from proceeding with a hearing on a warrant of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Osage Tribe of Indians v. IckesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. TaitanoDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1954
  2. Ho Yeh Sze v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. HOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967
  4. LAUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967
  5. PAYANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API