Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Kennington

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1890No. 14,033PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

The complaint in this case is by Kennington against the appellant railway company, and is in the ordinary form of a common count for work and labor done by the plaintiff at the special instance and request of the defendant, with an exhibited bill of particulars.

*410There was a general verdict for the plaintiff below, with answers to interrogatories. It is insisted that the evidence does not sustain the verdict of the jury, and it is also contended that the answers of the jury to the interrogatories propounded cover all the issues in the case, and therefore amount to a special verdict, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mitchell v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Burns v. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sloss v. AllmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Royal Indemnity Insurance v. ShueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API