Sloss v. Allman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County, and from an order refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
—Because of the contradictory and uncertain nature of the findings of the court below we must reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. The suit is to recover a balance of $1,350, alleged to be due the plaintiff on a contract alleged to have been made in writing between plaintiff and defendant, on or about April 24, 1874, by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to carry the United States mail as sub-contractor under Allman, between two certain designated points for a period of four years, for the sum of $5,400, which the complaint alleges defendant Allman agreed to pay…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gwin v. GwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. KenningtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Walley v. Deseret National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. VesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.